Almost all big companies and an increasing number of SMEs are using psychometric tests. The success of psychometric tests as a recruitment tool is widely recognised. However, one needs to "have a hold on all the cards" in order to use them properly!
The use of psychometric tests for recruitment has greatly increased in the last 10 years. Be it in Europe, India, or Australia, almost all big companies use them. In the US, however, the use of psychometric tests is more widespread, especially due to the governmental accreditation policy on use of these tests. It has also been found that around 70% of SMEs use psychometric tests.
"The costs of psychometric tests have also come down," remarks Vijai Pandey, Central Test's India Operations Manager, "which makes it viable for small companies to use them as well."
Tests: A "Recruitment Tool"
Given how increasingly similar CVs are, psychometric tests provide valuable help to recruiters by giving them objective information on those aspects that are often difficult to evaluate through other means. They allow recruiters to save time and money and reduce recruitment errors which could otherwise turn out to be a costly affair for the employer.
However, they are not to be regarded as a crystal ball, i.e. the sole thing to be relied on. They are only additional tools and in no case can they be considered as a substitute for a recruiter's judgment. "We do not recommend to use them as stand-alone tools. In all cases, the final decision has to be made by the recruiter," advises Vijai Pandey.
When Should These Tests Be Used?
It is best to use psychometric tests before the actual face-to-face interview, i.e. only after the initial sifting of CVs and the first telephonic interview has been completed.
The recruiter can get access to a whole lot of information that they could not otherwise get from the CV and cover letter alone. The recruiter can then use this data as a basis for discussion in the interview.
During the interview, the recruiter can confirm and validate the test results, as states Vijai Pandey: "The test results are an additional help in the exploratory phase". For example, if a test shows that a candidate has good innovation skills, the recruiter can question them on this to understand and find out how the candidate has brought about innovation in their previous jobs.
Which "Psychometric Tests" Should You Choose?
"The ideal thing to do is to get skills, as well as a personality test, is done, in order to have a holistic idea of the candidate's profile", explains Vijai Pandey. The tests should be selected based on the job profile. For example, for a junior position, the Reasoning Test is recommended in order to find out the Intellectual Quotient (IQ), the Temperament Evaluator test can be used to evaluate the personality of the individual, and the Sales Profile test can be used if it's a sales position.
On the other hand, an IQ test will not be suitable for a managerial position. It is desirable to do the Emotional Intelligence test in order to evaluate the Emotional Quotient (EQ), or the capacity to perceive, understand, and manage one's own emotions as well as others'. "I would recommend doing an emotional intelligence test if the position requires frequent interaction with other people," stresses Vijai Pandey.
In addition, the CTPI Pro personality test which is specially meant for managers can also be used.
How Can You Interpret the Results?
"The criteria for the required job profile have to be defined accurately before conducting any of these psychometric tests since these criteria will guide you in selecting the type of test, as well as in interpreting the results. Particularly for personality tests, the results make sense only in relation to the required job profile. There is no good or bad personality," states Vijai Pandey. "For example, if the Temperament Evaluator test reveals a strong need for supervision, this could be a positive point for a position which has many reporting levels, but it could prove to be a negative point for a manager who needs to carry out their functions autonomously."
Furthermore, several aspects should be known in order not to misinterpret the results. The reading of scores needs special attention: if candidate A gets a score twice greater than candidate B for the discretion dimension, it does not mean that A will be twice more discrete than B in the same situation. This means A will show more integrity in twice as many situations than B. Therefore, a score of 90% indiscretion means that the candidate will be discrete in 90% of situations. The other thing to know is that small differences in the score should be ignored when interpreting the results of psychometric tests.
"In order to master all these aspects, we advise that the testing staff should undergo training in the form of a one-day practical workshop. Training helps to obtain the correct approach in the selection, administration and interpretation of tests," concludes Vijai Pandey.